Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8528779
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 11, 20262026-06-11T08:52:44+00:00 2026-06-11T08:52:44+00:00

When a class implements the IDataErrorInfo interface and this class is part of a

  • 0

When a class implements the IDataErrorInfo interface and this class is part of a binding to a form, is there a way to temporarily disable the validation associated with the binding?

For example, if I do not want to allow empty strings in a property of my class, when the form opens the bound control is flagged as having an error (with a red border by default). I think it is a bit clunky to immediately flag the input as having an error (before the user even has a chance to enter something). Is there a way around this?

I have searched most of the afternoon but what I seem to be coming up with is how to disable the submit button until all input is valid (which is not really what I am after).

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-11T08:52:45+00:00Added an answer on June 11, 2026 at 8:52 am

    Have a flag in the class that implements the IDataErrorInfo which controls when the validation is done e.g. DoValiation;

    When the flag is false you would make IDataErrorInfo report that there are no errors (i.e. return null, etc).

    During view intialisation you would set the DoValidation flag to false in your model then let the view do all the Bindings to your data.

    After the view is “Loaded” you would then set the DoValidation flag to true….from that point on…changes to the data will cause the error indicators to appear if the values are still invalid.

    See this other post for more detail on how to structure your IDataErrorInfo code:

    • WPF UpdateSourceTrigger
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

From code how can we know which interfaces one class implements? Example: interface IDrink
I have a ViewModel class that implements the IDataErrorInfo Interface . In each property's
I'm using a Dictionary<int, MyType> in a class. That class implements a interface that
I wrote a class that implements the IGroupPolicyObject Interface in COM. one of the
I have a class that implements the IDisposable interface. I am using a webclient
I have a class that implements properties in a specific way, to handle some
I have a class called Primes and this class implements GetEnumerator() without implementing IEnumerable
When a class implements an interface, do the subclasses inherit the implemented interfaces too?
i'm very confused... I have a class which directly implements an interface: public class
How would you convert type Node into an immutable tree? This class implements a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.