Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 587009
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T15:10:01+00:00 2026-05-13T15:10:01+00:00

When a large system developed by Agile process requires a sudden large-scale change that

  • 0

When a large system developed by Agile process requires a sudden large-scale change that affects most everything, what is the best way to go about it using Agile? Does the iterative part change at this point?

For example, what if a decision is made to make a centralized system a distributed one? Or choose another large pervasive example.

Arguably large changes should have been planned for, but it’s never a perfect world which is one of the reasons Agile exists, so assume that suddenly a major change is introduced that shakes the foundation.

Edit to summarize solutions:

  • It’s incremental all the way no matter how large or small the change may be.
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T15:10:01+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 3:10 pm

    “Does the iterative part change at this point?”

    Never.

    No matter how “pervasive” the change appears to be, you still have to work incrementally, in iterations you can manage.

    You still have to prioritize the changes and make them in a way that will continue to pass unit tests and can be released when needed.

    You may, for example, find that fixing 80% of the system is sufficient, and you may release. Or may be required to fix 100% of the system before releasing.

    You still work incrementally. In sprints. Irrespective of when you release.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.