Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7706391
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 1, 20262026-06-01T00:06:52+00:00 2026-06-01T00:06:52+00:00

When a method is called by a thread with $SAFE = 4, that method

  • 0

When a method is called by a thread with $SAFE = 4, that method is run with the same $SAFE level:

def test_method
  raise "value of $SAFE inside the method: #{$SAFE}"
end
t = Thread.new{$SAFE = 4; self.test_method}; t.join
 => RuntimeError: value of $SAFE inside the method: 4

However, when a block is called, it seems to use the $SAFE from its original context instead:

test_lambda = lambda do
  raise "value of $SAFE inside the lambda: #{$SAFE}"
end
t = Thread.new{$SAFE = 4; test_lambda.call}; t.join
 => RuntimeError: value of $SAFE inside the lambda: 0

Can someone explain why it works this way? It seems like a security problem.

(the reason I’m using raise instead of puts is that puts doesn’t work at $SAFE = 4)

This can be used to eval a tainted string in a seemingly safe context:

test_lambda = lambda{|s| puts "Tainted: #{s.tainted?}"; eval s}
t = Thread.new{$SAFE = 4; test_lambda.call("puts `date`")}; t.join
=> Tainted: true
=> Fri Mar 30 03:15:33 UTC 2012
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-01T00:06:53+00:00Added an answer on June 1, 2026 at 12:06 am

    It’s because a lambda operates with the scope it was defined at (including all the local variables!)

    Hence, you defined the lambda at safe level 0, and it therefore executed at that level when it was called, as that’s what the state of the variable was.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a method called ReadTill that has the same body of code but
I'm attempting to write a thread-safe method which may only be called once (per
sleep() is a static method of class Thread. How does it work when called
there is a method called viewDidLoad that execute a code when the view is
I need to design a thread-safe logger. My logger must have a Log() method
I want to have thread save method that returns a unique current Timestamp.Even when
I have dll method that should be QoSed - this method should be called
I've this little method which is supposed to be thread safe. Everything works till
I have a custom collection (a thread-safe ObservableQueue). I implemented the business logic inside
I have a .NET 4 WCF service that maintains a thread-safe, in-memory, dictionary cache

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.