Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3346574
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T01:19:12+00:00 2026-05-18T01:19:12+00:00

When accessing a member of some class, I can use e.g.: this->myVar = 10

  • 0

When accessing a member of some class, I can use e.g.:

this->myVar = 10 

or I can just write:

myVar = 10

I like to use this-> because it explicitly declares that the variable is a member of this class, but does it cause any overhead in comparison to just using the variable name by itself?

As an alternative I could maybe add a unique prefix to the vars, such as _TmyVar, but I’ve been using this-> for a long time so I just wondered.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T01:19:13+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 1:19 am

    There is no overhead. The compiler will generate the exact same code for both versions.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Can anoyne recommend a good library that will let me easily read/write private member
I've seen some guides or blogs that say using this to access a class's
When accessing member that doesn't exist, automatically creates the object. $obj = new ClassName();
I'm trying to designing a class and I'm having issues with accessing some of
My brain is not working this morning. I need some help accessing some members
Yesterday I read some code of a colleague and came across this: class a_class
I am finding trouble accessing a private member of a class from a friend
Can anyone point to some code that deals with the security of files access
I have a class that has overloaded constructors. I'd like to re-factor the code
I quite often write code that copies member variables to a local stack variable

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.