Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8548583
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 11, 20262026-06-11T13:31:49+00:00 2026-06-11T13:31:49+00:00

When and which approach to use? Is there any reason to use asynchronous methods,

  • 0

When and which approach to use?

Is there any reason to use asynchronous methods, if for synchronous is dedicated separate thread?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-11T13:31:51+00:00Added an answer on June 11, 2026 at 1:31 pm

    You use the asynchronous method to prevent blocking the calling thread. Also, it is preferable to use this approach as opposed to creating your own dedicated thread that will use the sync method. This is .NET general-purpose advice, better to let .NET do the async work, than to create your own dedicated threads.

    EDIT: Here is one question that might be of interest to you regarding MSMQ and EndReceive, which is part of the asynchronous model for MSMQ in .NET.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

is there an easy approach to store my model, which I use with EclipseLink,
Is there any difference between these tow pieces of code & which approach is
I need some guidance around which approach to use to load binary files from
Which approach is better: 1) to use a third-party ORM system or 2) manually
Which approach is better to use if I need a member (sp or func)
Is there any gem/plugin for ruby on rails which gives the ability to define
I am unsure on which approach will give me a better performance: I have
Design wise and performance wise which approach is recommended for handling multiple Zeromq sockets
I am trying to decide on which approach to take in a database I
I wanted others to explain to me, which approach is better: using a session

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.