Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 49301
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T16:24:55+00:00 2026-05-10T16:24:55+00:00

When authoring a library in a particular namespace, it’s often convenient to provide overloaded

  • 0

When authoring a library in a particular namespace, it’s often convenient to provide overloaded operators for the classes in that namespace. It seems (at least with g++) that the overloaded operators can be implemented either in the library’s namespace:

namespace Lib { class A { };  A operator+(const A&, const A&); } // namespace Lib 

or the global namespace

namespace Lib { class A { }; } // namespace Lib  Lib::A operator+(const Lib::A&, const Lib::A&); 

From my testing, they both seem to work fine. Is there any practical difference between these two options? Is either approach better?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T16:24:55+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 4:24 pm

    You should define them in the library namespace. The compiler will find them anyway through argument dependant lookup.

    No need to pollute the global namespace.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Does anyone know of a google maps library that you can define your own
Where can I get the JavaFx Authoring tool?
What's the best solution for authoring HTML5 in Emacs? Is there a mode that
The authorize filter allows you to specified group of users that can access a
I would like to ask if there's any Java package or library that have
I've written + imported my own library that includes an OAuth login feature. It
I'm making a mixed UserControl and Control Library in WPF. I need to provide
I've been given some code that is in effect a class library with a
How can I get LWP to verify that the certificate of the server I'm
I'm creating a newspaper authoring system. Today I'm using Aspose.Words library to generate newspaper

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.