Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6342143
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T20:10:55+00:00 2026-05-24T20:10:55+00:00

When calling BlockingCollection.Take() it is possible for the IsCompleted status of the collection to

  • 0

When calling BlockingCollection.Take() it is possible for the IsCompleted status of the collection to change between the check of IsCompleted and the call to Take().

The MSDN Documentation that shows an example just catches the invalid operation exception, but it seems like there must be a proper way to do such a call without catching the exception (since this incurs a decent amount of overhead and doesn’t look clean in code). What is the proper way to call .Take() and to avoid an invalid operation exception?

A simplified version of my specific issue:

If (!blockingCollection.IsCompleted)
{
//do some stuff
value = blockingCollection.Take();  //Throws Exception, IsCompleted = True;
}

There is a TryTake method available, but I am under the impression that it is so that a timeout and cancelation token can be passed in, not to deal with the IsCompleted becoming true in between the time it is checked and when Take() is called.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T20:10:56+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 8:10 pm

    You can use the TryTake overload with no timeout/cancelation. It will return false if the BlockingCollection is empty or has been marked completed, and handles the synchronization issue you’re facing correctly.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Calling System.gc() requests that garbage collection takes place, and isn't guaranteed. The part about
Calling the WriteObject Method from a background thread is not possible! Is there a
Calling Html.RenderPartial(~/Views/Payments/MyControl.ascx); from a view works if MyControl.ascx is a control that directly inherits
Calling setFocus(null) on the ItemizedOverlay does not 'unfocus' current marker. According to the documentation:
Calling all cross-compatibility experts! Please check out this page on my site, as it
Calling IEnumSTATURL::Next within my application returns E_UNEXPECTED(0x8000FFFF) instead of S_OK . Sadly, that particular
Calling the setTimeout function will return an integer ID so that clearTimeout can be
Calling TDataSet.DisableControls disables the link between master/detail datasets. Is there another way to disable
Calling startActivityForResult gives me ActivityNotFoundException . I wanted to know that is it even
Calling the function on load and the error is pointing to that. I don't

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.