Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 44159
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T15:36:31+00:00 2026-05-10T15:36:31+00:00

When calling CoInitializeEx , you can specify the following values for dwCoInit : typedef

  • 0

When calling CoInitializeEx, you can specify the following values for dwCoInit:

typedef enum tagCOINIT {     COINIT_MULTITHREADED     = 0x0,     COINIT_APARTMENTTHREADED = 0x2,     COINIT_DISABLE_OLE1DDE   = 0x4,     COINIT_SPEED_OVER_MEMORY = 0x8, } COINIT; 

What does the suggestively titled ‘speed over memory’ value do? Is it ignored these days in COM?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T15:36:31+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 3:36 pm

    No idea if it’s still used but it was meant to change the balance used by the COM algorithms.

    If you had tons of memory and wanted speed at all costs, you would set that flag.

    In low-memory environments, leaving that flag off would favor reduced memory usage.


    As it turns out, the marvellous Raymond Chen (of "The Old New Thing" fame) has now weighed in on the subject and, despite what that flag was meant to do, it apparently does nothing at all.

    See What does the COINIT_SPEED_OVER_MEMORY flag to CoInitializeEx do? for more details:

    When should you enable this mode? It doesn’t matter, because as far as I can tell, there is no code anywhere in COM that changes its behavior based on whether the process has been placed into this mode! It looks like the flag was added when DCOM was introduced, but it never got hooked up to anything. (Or whatever code that had been hooked up to it never shipped.)

    Also http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/microsoft/various/dcom/2001-q1/0160.html from Steve Swartz, one of the original COM+ architects:

    COINIT_SPEED_OVER_MEMORY is ignored by COM.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 316k
  • Answers 316k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If you add default values of "" to your genreID… May 13, 2026 at 11:31 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer It's returning the proper number of results. I had a… May 13, 2026 at 11:31 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer As a temporary object (12.2), the result of the +… May 13, 2026 at 11:31 pm

Related Questions

Come across what looks at first sight like an MT-issue, but I'm trying to
After much help from all my StackOverFlow brethren, I managed to create a C++
From some old c++ code im trying to use a com dll, it works
I have a COM class CMyCOMServer implementing IMyInterface in one application, both with correct

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.