Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 152485
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T09:37:54+00:00 2026-05-11T09:37:54+00:00

When dealing with double data types is multiplying by the inverse better or worse?

  • 0

When dealing with double data types is multiplying by the inverse better or worse?

Which way is faster? Which way uses less memory? Which way is preferred?

How does MSIL handle this?

SquareInches = MMSquared / 645.16  SquareInches = MMSquared * 0.0015500031000062000124000248000496 

NB: 10K users will note that this is a duplicate of this question, which was deleted because the original question asker decided to berate everyone in the ‘comments’ section of the question.

This question was reposted because it is a ‘good’ question.

Please ‘uncheck’ Community Wiki for your answer, as I’m only posting this as CW so that it’s not seen as a ‘reputation’ grab.

Related Question:

Should I use multiplication or division?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T09:37:55+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 9:37 am

    Multiplying by the inverse is faster. Compilers don’t optimize this automatically because it can result in a small loss of precision. (This actually came up on a D newsgroup Walter Bright frequents, and he made it clear that compilers do not do this automatically.) You should normally divide because it is more readable and accurate.

    If you are executing a piece of floating point code a billion times in a loop and you don’t care about a small loss of precision and you will be dividing by the same number several times, then multiplying by the inverse can be a good optimization. I have actually gotten significant real world speedup in a few cases like the ones described by multiplying by the inverse, but these are extreme edge cases in loops executed several billion times that pretty much do nothing but multiply floats.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Dealing with Java - which the option you prefer in the most cases -
I'm dealing with financial data, so there's a lot of it and it needs
I am dealing with a set of native functions that return data through dynamically-allocated
I'm dealing with a large code base that uses the following construct throughout class
What's a good way to store point cloud data so that it's optimal for
I'm dealing with doubles and looking for the double equivalent of this... ArrayList<NameValuePair> nameValuePairs
At the moment I am dealing with large amounts of float/double datasets to be
I'm having an asbolute nightmare dealing with an array of numbers which has the
We all know that parameterized SQL is the way to go when dealing with
iam dealing with multiscale images , 3 sizes : original , half & double

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.