Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 628041
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T19:35:37+00:00 2026-05-13T19:35:37+00:00

When (deep) Cloning a custom object, should I use clone.str1 = String.Copy(obj.str1) or clone.str1

  • 0

When (deep) Cloning a custom object, should I use clone.str1 = String.Copy(obj.str1) or clone.str1 = obj.str1?

I’d prefer the latter – shorter and quicker, but is it “safe”?

I’d point to this thread, but, however, not sure what to use.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T19:35:38+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 7:35 pm

    Yes – the latter choice (simple assignment) is safe for strings (in managed code), as this code illustrates:

        string s1 = "Initial Value";
        string s2 = s1;
    
        Console.WriteLine("String1: " + s1);
        Console.WriteLine("String2: " + s2);
    
        s1 = "New Value";
    
        Console.WriteLine("String1 - after change: " + s1);
        Console.WriteLine("String2 - after change: " + s2);
    

    Output:

    String1: Initial Value
    String2: Initial Value
    String1 - after change: New Value
    String2 - after change: Initial Value
    

    Strings are immutable – so when you change s1, you are really creating a new string and assigning it. The reference of s2 remains pointing to the old instance.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 337k
  • Answers 337k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Use a Backgroundworker. It has a ReportProgress method + event… May 14, 2026 at 3:58 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer struct Scanner { template <typename T> typename boost::enable_if<boost::is_integral<T>, T>::type get()… May 14, 2026 at 3:58 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You can do this using a batch file like this:… May 14, 2026 at 3:58 am

Related Questions

To keep the long story short, I am unable to use the container from
I have a sequence of ActiveRecord objects that I want to cascade destroy but
Suppose I have an application with the following code: public class Node { public
I want to be able to deep clone 10 instances of an ActiveRecord model
We have an application that performs comparisons on data objects to determine if one

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.