Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 563953
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T12:42:53+00:00 2026-05-13T12:42:53+00:00

When defining a COM-visible class in C++ I can define the supported threading model

  • 0

When defining a COM-visible class in C++ I can define the supported threading model in the header file (the threading(single) line):

[
    coclass,
    default(IComInterface),
    threading(single),
    vi_progid("Example.ComClass"),
    progid("Example.ComClass.1"),
    version(1.0),
    uuid("72861DF5-4C77-43ec-A4DC-ED04396F0CCD")
]

Is there a comparable way of setting the threading model in .NET (for example an attribute)? I currently define my COM-class as such:

[Guid("67155A91-2948-43f5-B07F-5C55CDD240E5")]
[ComVisible(true)]
[InterfaceType(ComInterfaceType.InterfaceIsDual)]
public interface IComInterface
{
    ...
}


[Guid("DC5E6955-BB29-44c8-9FC0-6AADEEB2AFFB")]
[ClassInterface(ClassInterfaceType.None)]
[ProgId("Example.ComClass")]
public class ComClass : IComInterface
{
    ...
}

–edit:

The comments on the marked answer are the really important thing. It seems like the only way to tell RegAsm to set a different ThreadingModel is to write a custom registration method marked with the [ComRegisterFunction]attribute.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T12:42:53+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 12:42 pm

    That’s really obscure, I’ve never seen the “threading” attribute in MIDL. Nor have the MSDN Library authors.

    A COM coclass publishes its threading requirements in the registry, using the HKCR\CLSID\{guid}\InProcServer32 key. The ThreadingModel value declares the apartment it needs. If it is missing or is set to “Apartment” then is announces that is not thread-safe and requires help from an STA thread. CoCreateInstance() uses this value when it creates the object. If necessary it will start an STA thread and create a proxy if the current thread is not STA, ensuring it is always used in a thread-safe way.

    A [ComVisible] .NET class will be registered as “Both”, indicating that it is okay to be used on a thread in the MTA. Pretty optimistic, but follows the .NET philosophy that everything is thread-unsafe but can be made safe by putting the lock keyword in the right places. A promise that is not often tested btw, risky. Overriding the ThreadingModel value (or omitting it) requires writing code to register the coclass yourself, decorated with the [ComRegisterFunction] attribute. RegistrationServices.RegisterTypeForComClients() can be useful to get the basic keys into place.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 357k
  • Answers 357k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The other answers are correct. Here is some code you… May 14, 2026 at 9:40 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer you ruin the noConflict concept by reassigning the jquery to… May 14, 2026 at 9:40 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If you get that particular error, you don't actually have… May 14, 2026 at 9:40 am

Related Questions

No related questions found

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.