Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 252641
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T21:41:42+00:00 2026-05-11T21:41:42+00:00

When defining a resource orientated RESTful service do you think it’s a good idea

  • 0

When defining a resource orientated RESTful service do you think it’s a good idea to define an explicit operation (verb) for querying data?

It seems obvious and easy to map CRUD operations on a resource orientated RESTful service using HTTP to operations such as PUT, GET, POST & DELETE but how should operations that query for multiple resources be mapped – using a new operation called ‘QUERY’ or still use ‘GET’ that returns a collection of resources.

I’m interested in people opinions and experience…

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T21:41:42+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 9:41 pm

    REST is about resources. What resource will your query return? A set of data? How is that set identified? How is it parameterized? This should determine the URL you would use with the GET operation:

    GET /customers  would retrieve all customers
    GET /customers?q=<query> would retrieve all customers matching the query
    

    EDIT: The following not quite so clear to me

    Thinking about the query as being about retrieving a resource which is a set of customers (for instance), I started to wonder about well-defined subsets of the set of all customers. Consider things like:

    GET /customers/state/MA              Retrieve all customers in Massachusetts
    GET /customers/country/UK            All in the UK
    GET /customers/country/UK/postalcode/001-234    All in that postal code in the UK
    

    Resources like these make sense to me as clearly identified resources, and not as queries. I’d continue to use a query string to retrieve an arbitrary set of customers, but where there is a natural partition of customers, I might indicate that in the URL space.

    Recall that the GET operation is meant for idempotent operations, and is meant to promote caching. The response to these queries should permit some reasonable amount of caching (one day, perhaps). This would permit a client machine or proxy server to cache the result set for a period of time, saving server round trips.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Currently I'm defining a variety of Fragments in the resource file and hiding them
When defining parameter type that is e.g. in System.Data you have no intellisense and
I am defining a lot of my constant strings in the R.strings resource for
Is there a way to use a ValueConverter without defining it in a resource?
I have created a static resource defining the border of a specific item in
I am defining a XAML DrawingBrush resource and I want to draw a custom
I have some problems defining the permissions for a twice nested resource. I have
Roy Fielding writes A REST API must not define fixed resource names or hierarchies
When defining custom resource themes for a wpf application, I can set width /
When defining simple DataMapper resource, it sets default storage engine to InnoDB, but I

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.