Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
When I create utility classes I typically create a class that has a private constructor and exposes all of it’s methods and properties as static. What’s the best approach for this? What’s the difference between the way I do or creating a static class?
Static classes are automatically sealed, so people can’t inherit and override their behavior.
That is the only real difference (unless there is something special in the IL)
So if you use a static class, you save yourself the trouble of making the constructor private, and declaring the class sealed.
I would add, that defining a class as static, is ‘self-documenting’ code. Users of your library will know that this class should not be instantiated, and only has static values.