Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 846927
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T06:41:48+00:00 2026-05-15T06:41:48+00:00

When I do ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem, I don’t want unhandled exceptions to kill my entire process.

  • 0

When I do ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem, I don’t want unhandled exceptions to kill my entire process. So I do something like:

ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem(delegate() {
    try { FunctionIActuallyWantToCall(); }
    catch { HandleException(); }
});

Is this the recommended pattern? It seems like there should be a simpler way to do this. It’s in an asp.net-mvc app, if that’s relevant.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T06:41:49+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 6:41 am

    You need to catch the exception inside the callback (as in your example) to avoid propagating into the calling thread. This is the recommended pattern. If it is an ASP.NET application you could also handle it in the Application_Error method in Global.asax

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 499k
  • Answers 499k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I came up with the following rack-test hack, and slightly… May 16, 2026 at 12:35 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer InterfaceOrientation can return "unknown" value, in these cases you can… May 16, 2026 at 12:35 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Ok, I have made some progress. It seems that the… May 16, 2026 at 12:35 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Related Questions

Completly new here with a question regaridng this post : ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem with a lambda
I am writing a windows service that uses ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem() . Each thread is a
I want a timer tick/elapsed event inside a new thread. It seems like I
I was working on a project and there is bulk e-mail sending part of
I am calling the SQL Server Reporting Services Webservice from inside an asp.net application.
I have an ASP.NET app, very basic, but right now too much code to
I have some code using a System.Transactions.TransactionScope , that creating a new instance of
Right now I do: Util.AssertBackgroundThread(); or Util.AssertUIThread(); at the start of the methods. This
I have a task that is not important ; it should be run once
We have a client application that needs to send messages to a server for

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.