Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6241625
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T11:48:06+00:00 2026-05-24T11:48:06+00:00

When I have a method which returns a collection of objects, what I should

  • 0

When I have a method which returns a collection of objects, what I should return if the objects count is zero? null or just empty List<T>? What is good practice?

public List<string> GetPupilsByClass(string className)
{
     ....
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T11:48:07+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 11:48 am

    I’d definitely return an empty list so methods can still be called on the object without requiring null checks. There’s a difference between returning an empty list and returning nothing at all, so the calling code probably isn’t expecting to receive a null reference anyway (unless an exception occurs or something).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a method which compares two objects and returns a list of all
I have a method which returns an array of fixed type objects (let's say
I have a method which never returns a null object. I want to make
I have a method which returns some xml in a memory stream private MemoryStream
I have a Java method which returns an array of doubles. I would then
I have a JNI method to access java method which returns an Integer object.
I have a method named RenderContent which returns object[] In my unit test, I
I have a class that has an output() method which returns a matplotlib Figure
I have a method in .NET (C#) which returns string[][] . When using RegAsm
I have got method which is using Assembly.LoadFrom(...) statement and returns the supported cultures

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.