Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 92653
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T23:13:14+00:00 2026-05-10T23:13:14+00:00

When I make the same query twice, the second time it does not return

  • 0

When I make the same query twice, the second time it does not return new rows form the database (I guess it just uses the cache).

This is a Windows Form application, where I create the dataContext when the application starts.

How can I force Linq to SQL not to use the cache?

Here is a sample function where I have the problem:

public IEnumerable<Orders> NewOrders() {     return from order in dataContext.Orders            where order.Status == 1            select order;  } 
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T23:13:15+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 11:13 pm

    The simplest way would be to use a new DataContext – given that most of what the context gives you is caching and identity management, it really sounds like you just want a new context. Why did you want to create just the one and then hold onto it?

    By the way, for simple queries like yours it’s more readable (IMO) to use ‘normal’ C# with extension methods rather than query expressions:

    public IEnumerable<Orders> NewOrders() {     return dataContext.Orders.Where(order => order.Status == 1); } 

    EDIT: If you never want it to track changes, then set ObjectTrackingEnabled to false before you do anything. However, this will severely limit it’s usefulness. You can’t just flip the switch back and forward (having made queries between). Changing your design to avoid the singleton context would be much better, IMO.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 86k
  • Answers 86k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Add a string at the end of your URL to… May 11, 2026 at 5:21 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer As I've just recently learned, PHP has an array union… May 11, 2026 at 5:21 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Try to name the table with two ##, this will… May 11, 2026 at 5:21 pm

Related Questions

I have a query roughly like this: select * from A_TABLE where A_COLUMN =
I'm using a table adapter in Visual Studio to make a query to a
When I started writing database queries I didn't know the JOIN keyword yet and
I'm rewriting our NAnt build scripts to make them cleaner and simpler, as well

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.