Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 270969
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T00:05:14+00:00 2026-05-12T00:05:14+00:00

When I say full I mean a language that’s not an extension to some

  • 0

When I say “full” I mean a language that’s not an extension to some already existent language like Java or C++. When OOP started it begun with extensions for procedural languages like C and Pascal. Is there any Aspect-Oriented programming language “by itself”?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T00:05:14+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 12:05 am

    Short answer: No

    But there are languages that contain constructs that mimic aspects, for example Haskel which contains the possibility to add advices or Smalltalk because of its message approach. You could also look at Eifel with its contract oriented approach – that could be compared to applying aspects to functions.

    But a pure AOP language, I would say no.

    Edit: And sure enough, someone found an AOP language 😉

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Firstly, I would like to say that I don't mean the full path, what
Let's say I have a dictionary full of objects for keys that may or
What does it mean that I have to apply? Can day say: No, we
I have a directory full of scripts (let's say project/bin ). I also have
Say I have a method that returns this. Vector[ (PkgLine, Tree) ]() I want
I have just started exploring TWILL . Twill is an amazing scripting language for
I want to be clear on this. When I say domain anaemia, I mean
I got tired of searching and never finding a programming language that fits my
I now understand that a clustered index contains all of the row data, not
Say I have the name of a file and it's full path in two

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.