Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4083150
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T18:16:37+00:00 2026-05-20T18:16:37+00:00

When I serialize active records I’m finding that the yaml format is different depending

  • 0

When I serialize active records I’m finding that the yaml format is different depending on which box I’m running on. On one box I get:

object: !ruby/object:User 

instead of

object: !ruby/ActiveRecord:User 

The first version is a problem because active support needs to do some magic to populate the active record correctly when the yaml is deserialized. What causes this difference and how can I ensure that the second format is used?


I’m using ruby 1.9.2 and I’ve forced the yaml engine to use syck using

require "yaml"
YAML::ENGINE.yamler = "syck"

in the boot.rb (rails app).

Update

Having dug a little further I’ve discovered that the ActiveRecord type isn’t being registered with yaml. On the server where it works the following call:

YAML.resolver.tags.keys

includes:

"tag:ruby.yaml.org,2002:ActiveRecord"

This type is missing from the server that’s behaving incorrectly. The problem now is that I have no idea why the type isn’t registered.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T18:16:37+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 6:16 pm

    The problem turned out to be interactions between a few different environment issues that I didn’t mention in the original question.

    So the problem turned out to be a configuration issue with passenger. If you have a file in your project at config/setup_load_paths.rb then your Gemfile isn’t loaded. I’d added

    require "yaml"
    YAML::ENGINE.yamler = "syck"
    

    at the top of my Gemfile to ensure that the engine was selected before rails loaded and registered it’s active record converter with yaml. Passenger wasn’t running the Gemfile so the engine was never getting set and ruby was defaulting to pysch instead of syck. The current version of delayed_job forces the use of syck but because psych was being loaded the syck engine never had the active record converter registered with it.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a controller action that calls a model method which generates a serialized
I have a model class that is not bound to Active record. class ProcessingStatus
I have a model that uses a serialized column: class Form < ActiveRecord::Base serialize
I have a Model called statistics which has a value field that contains Goals
I am trying to use the XMLSerializer with a castle active record class which
I have a high-traffic site that records web hits in a table, Hits. There's
In my model I have: class Log < ActiveRecord::Base serialize :data ... def self.recover(table_name,
I have a simple model like this: class User < ActiveRecord::Base serialize :preferences end
While working with ActiveRecord I have a table which stores a serialized array of
I serialize some configuration objects and store the result bytes within a database. new

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.