Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 52569
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T16:55:39+00:00 2026-05-10T16:55:39+00:00

When I type ‘from’ (in a LINQ query) after importing System.Linq namespace , it

  • 0

When I type ‘from’ (in a LINQ query) after importing System.Linq namespace, it is understood as a keyword. How does this magic happen?

Is ‘from’ a extension method on some type?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T16:55:40+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 4:55 pm

    In practice, yes – LINQ keywords map to extension methods. But actually, it is more interesting; it is literally as though the compiler substitutes directly for a few key methods, i.e.

    var qry = from cust in db.Customers           where cust.IsActive           select cust; 

    becomes:

    var qry = db.Customers.Where(cust => cust.IsActive); 

    (if we had a non-trivial select, it would add .Select(…some projection…)

    Different LINQ kewords map to different methods – i.e. there is OrderBy, GroupBy, ThenBy, OrderByDescending, etc.

    In the case of IEnumerable<T>/IQueryable<T>, this then resolves these via extension methods (typically courtesy of Enumerable/Queryable)- however, if your queryable objects declared their own Where/OrderBy/etc then these would get used in preference.

    Jon Skeet covers this a lot more in the latter parts of C# in Depth. I’ve also seen an example of Jon’s where he discusses some really bizarre implications of this – such as calling static methods on a type.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Type.GetType(System.String) Is there a lookup for the aliases available somewhere? Type.GetType(string) returns null .
Consider type like this one public interface IHaveGenericMethod { T1 Method<T1>(T1 parm); T2 Method<T1,T2>(T1
Type mismatch. Expecting a LexBuffer<char> but given a LexBuffer<byte> The type 'char' does not
type SQLConn = val mutable private connection : string option member this.Connection with get()
Type t = typeof(bool); string typeName = t.Name; In this simple example, typeName would
Type erasure is supposed to erase all generic information... If this is the case
Exception type: System.ComponentModel.Win32Exception Exception message: Error creating window handle. I could not reproduce it
The type or namespace name 'XmlConfigurator' could not be found (are you missing a
Error: Type mismatch: cannot convert from Set<ConstraintViolation<capture#1-of ?>> to Set<ConstraintViolation<Class<?>>> My code: public class
I have this type definition: data Operace = Op (Int->Int->Int) String (Int->Int->Int) deriving Show

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.