Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6919463
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T09:59:35+00:00 2026-05-27T09:59:35+00:00

When I’m running Map-Reduce on a Mongo database, I usually get results similar to

  • 0

When I’m running Map-Reduce on a Mongo database, I usually get results similar to the following:

{ _id: <some-id>, value: { <first-key>: <first-value>, ... } }

Is there a way to omit the value: { ... } part and directly insert the content of value in the result? Basically, I’d like to have a result that looks like the following:

{ _id: <some-id>, <first-key>: <first-value>, ... }

This way I could merge the results back into an existing collection that obeys this format.

I also have an other question regarding Map-Reduce: Is it possible to access another collection from withing a map or reduce function?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T09:59:36+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 9:59 am

    MapReduce only returns documents of the form {_id:some_id, value:some_value}

    “some_value” does not necessarily have to be an embedded document, but in most cases it is to allow multiple variables to be calculated by the Map Reduce function. The documents returned by the Reduce function must be in the same form as they are input, because the Reduce function may be run repeatedly for any given _id value.

    For a step-by-step of how Map Reduce works, please see the “Extras” section of the MongoDB Cookbook recipe titled “Finding Max And Min Values with Versioned Documents” http://cookbook.mongodb.org/patterns/finding_max_and_min/ This should provide a better understanding of how Map Reduce works, and why the output must be in the format {_id:some_id, value:some_value}

    It is possible to do an incremental Map Reduce, which will merge the results of multiple Map Reduce functions.
    http://www.mongodb.org/display/DOCS/MapReduce#MapReduce-IncrementalMapreduce

    Finally, it is currently not possible to access multiple collections at once with Map Reduce. There is a feature request for this capability, but it is not scheduled to be added to any upcoming versions.
    https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/SERVER-970

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
I have just tried to save a simple *.rtf file with some websites and
For some reason, after submitting a string like this Jack’s Spindle from a text
I am currently running into a problem where an element is coming back from
I have a French site that I want to parse, but am running into
I'm using v2.0 of ClassTextile.php, with the following call: $testimonial_text = $textile->TextileRestricted($_POST['testimonial']); ... and
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an &#8217; in it. SimpleXML turns this
We're building an app, our first using Rails 3, and we're having to build
I have a reasonable size flat file database of text documents mostly saved in
I ran into a problem. Wrote the following code snippet: teksti = teksti.Trim() teksti

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.