Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 35301
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T14:12:52+00:00 2026-05-10T14:12:52+00:00

When implementing a needle search of a haystack in an object-oriented way, you essentially

  • 0

When implementing a needle search of a haystack in an object-oriented way, you essentially have three alternatives:

1. needle.find(haystack)  2. haystack.find(needle)  3. searcher.find(needle, haystack)

Which do you prefer, and why?

I know some people prefer the second alternative because it avoids introducing a third object. However, I can’t help feeling that the third approach is more conceptually ‘correct’, at least if your goal is to model ‘the real world’.

In which cases do you think it is justified to introduce helper objects, such as the searcher in this example, and when should they be avoided?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T14:12:53+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 2:12 pm

    Usually actions should be applied to what you are doing the action on… in this case the haystack, so I think option 2 is the most appropriate.

    You also have a fourth alternative that I think would be better than alternative 3:

    haystack.find(needle, searcher) 

    In this case, it allows you to provide the manner in which you want to search as part of the action, and so you can keep the action with the object that is being operated on.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 86k
  • Answers 86k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The usual culprit here is things like events (in B.Logic),… May 11, 2026 at 5:18 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Dim result as boolean result = integer.tryparse(QueryString("propID"), myintegervariable) boolean will… May 11, 2026 at 5:18 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer One approach is perhaps to supply a bootstrapping application that… May 11, 2026 at 5:18 pm

Related Questions

When implementing a singleton in C++, is it better for GetInstance() to return a
When implementing a Matrix construct using arrays, which would be more efficient? Using a
Is it necessary to set large objects to null when implementing a Dispose() method?
C++/CLI helpfully generates the IDisposable scaffolding for you when you implement a destructor on

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.