Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 62133
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T18:25:41+00:00 2026-05-10T18:25:41+00:00

When in Outlook 2003, open the Address Book, select Tools->Options. You get the address

  • 0

When in Outlook 2003, open the Address Book, select Tools->Options. You get the address dialog showing the option ‘When sending mail, check names using these address lists in the following order:’

Address dialog

For most people, this will contain only ‘Contacts’. For corporate networks, it’ll probably also contain ‘Global Address List’. The problem is that in my company the GAL is many tens of thousands large, and it’s common that conflicts occur in name resolution when attempting to send email and it goes to the wrong person in another country.

Instead, I would like to place a separate Exchange address list ‘X’ at the top of that list, to first resolve against names in our own company before checking the GAL. Then, resolve against ‘Contacts’, then GAL. This configuration would need to be deployed to many hundreds of PCs.

I’ve been able to do this on my own PC by hacking registry key: HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Windows Messaging Subsystem\Profiles\your_profile_name\9207f3e0a3b11019908b08002b2a56c2, Value 11023d05.

This contains a REG_BINARY data structure that lists the IDs of the items of this list. I can reorder them to my liking and Outlook accepts it.

The IDs of the GAL and ‘X’ address list are static. However, the problem is that the ‘Contacts’ ID is apparently not static, perhaps unique to the user and/or computer. Its value appears to be undiscoverable in the registry. This prevents me from simply copying this registry value to all PCs.

Has anyone been able to progammatically reorder the contact name resolution list?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T18:25:42+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 6:25 pm

    I have done this for a company in the past. It was a .NET application, that ran on every PC and reordered this listing.

    This is where you need to start:

    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb820991.aspx

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 79k
  • Answers 79k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Are you properly base64 decoding your the string from your… May 11, 2026 at 4:11 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Don't version the URI at all. Instead just version the… May 11, 2026 at 4:11 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Table of contents Illustration of problem Illustration of one solution… May 11, 2026 at 4:11 pm

Related Questions

When in Outlook 2003, open the Address Book, select Tools->Options. You get the address
Aparently, encoding japanese emails is somewhat challenging, which I am slowly discovering myself. In
I am trying to make an Outlook 2003 add-in using Visual Studio 2008 on
I am trying to send a Rich Text Format email message using Outlook 2003.
I have an application with one form in it, and on the Load method

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.