Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 921593
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T18:53:39+00:00 2026-05-15T18:53:39+00:00

When initializing properties of controls or other values related to a Form I have

  • 0

When initializing properties of controls or other values related to a Form I have a tendency to switch back and forth between initializing the values in the Form’s constructor and then later when the Form.Load event is evoked.

What is the generally accepted usage of a Forms constructor vs it’s Form.Load event? With other classes I would do all initialization in the constructor. Yet in in VS when you double click on a Form it jumps you to an event handler for the Form.Load event not the constructor. This leads me to believe that it’s preferable to do all the initialization after the Load event instead of the constructor.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T18:53:40+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 6:53 pm

    Yes, it is a wee bit sad that it works that way. It made a lot of sense at the time, now 10 years ago already. Windows Forms was targeted to be a replacement for VB6, the dominant point-and-click UI designer at the time. And Form_Load was important in VB6, that’s where you customized the form view.

    That wasn’t really appropriate from the get-go, the Form class has a true-blooded constructor. And you can set control properties in the constructor before the actual native Window control gets created. There’s a ton of code in WF to make that work. Code that the designer relies on, it sets these properties before the Load event fires. It is very efficient to do so, many controls get a lot slower when they need to be updated after their window is created. Like ListView and TreeView.

    There are few reasons to not use the constructor yourself, like the designer does, especially since the C# IDE doesn’t try to hide the constructor. Except one: you need the Load event when you write the kind of code that requires knowing the actual form size. That size isn’t known until the window actually gets created, the Load event is the earliest after that. That ought to be rare.

    And of course, if you do want to use Load then you override OnLoad instead of using the Load event. That would be another one.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

When initializing members in a C# class which also have Properties with full access
Say you have an domain entity with business logic for initializing its default values.
When you have automatic properties, C# compiler asks you to call the this constructor
I was initializing the object in the code below using simple properties but then
I have a problem initializing an array whose size is defined as extern const.
I have certain initializing functions that I use to set up audit logging on
I am initializing a mutable string and then logging it as follows. NSMutableString* mStr
I have a very odd problem. A class property is mysteriously reset between method
Is there any problem in initializing Sets in the constructor of a class persisted
I have an application that is driven by a configuration XML: various app properties

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.