Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1101607
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T01:03:36+00:00 2026-05-17T01:03:36+00:00

When it is in fact not defined, it gets the value nil just because

  • 0

When it is in fact not defined, it gets the value nil just because it was “touched”:

$ irb

ruby-1.9.2-p0 > foo = true if !defined? foo
 => nil 
ruby-1.9.2-p0 > foo
 => nil 

ruby-1.9.2-p0 > if !defined? bar
ruby-1.9.2-p0 ?>  bar = true
ruby-1.9.2-p0 ?>  end
 => true 
ruby-1.9.2-p0 > bar
 => true 

so the if … end works as expected, but foo = true if ... doesn’t.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T01:03:36+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 1:03 am

    Ruby defines a local variable just before executing a line containing an assignment, so defined?(foo) will always be true for the one-liner.

    Another example showing that local variables are defined before any part of the line are executed:

    defined? foo # => false
    foo = foo    # => foo is now nil
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

this one is not homework, it just the fact that i've been out of
Fact: I'm not that good with jQuery. Problem: I have a form containing dynamically
Consider a fact table of the form: CREATE TABLE Fact1 ( Dim1 int NOT
I have a problem with nodejs and connect and the fact that it's not
I was surprised by the fact that Map<?,?> is not a Collection<?> . I
Update: Ok, after getting past the fact that I did not have MSDTC set
Right so, I'm not particularly skilled at this at all, this is in fact
In Ruby, suppose I have a class Foo to allow me to catalogue my
Despite the fact that XML attributs can be defined using single or double quotes,
I have defined two module types and two modules module type FOO = sig

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.