Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 230363
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T19:50:35+00:00 2026-05-11T19:50:35+00:00

When linq to entities was released, everybody say that linq to sql is dead.

  • 0

When linq to entities was released, everybody say that linq to sql is dead.

But most books and sample projects by microsoft employees, use mvc+linq to sql.

There is some reason for that? The linq to sql seems better for POCO, would it?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T19:50:36+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 7:50 pm

    Linq to SQL had its origins in a thought experiment. Linq needed a proof of concept, and Linq to SQL provided that.

    Since then, many in the user community (including a few prominent Microsoft employees) have embraced Linq to SQL as the lightweight SQL Server ORM of choice, especially for small projects like NerdDinner.

    The furor began with this post by the ADO.NET team. In it, they said that Linq to SQL will be maintained, and features added based on user community feedback, but that the Entity Framework would be the primary focus of future data access efforts.

    Many in the user community interpreted this move as “Microsoft is killing Linq to SQL.”

    Microsoft didn’t help matters when it disabled the provider model for Linq to SQL by sealing some critical classes, effectively making Linq to SQL usable only with SQL Server. The Entity Framework will be the ORM of choice for multiple data providers.

    Unfortunately, the Entity Framework seems not quite ready for prime time.

    So it depends on who you believe. Do you believe the speculations (and they are just speculations) of many bloggers who say that Linq to SQL is truly dead and buried, or do you believe people like Damien Guard of Microsoft, who says that Linq to SQL has a long life ahead of it?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a Linq-to-Entities query that is not complicated but requires an .include and/or
I'm using LINQ to Entities to display paged results. But I'm having issues with
We use LINQ to Entities to write entries into an Audit database (SQL Server
How can I write a linq to entities query that includes a having clause?
I have the following linq-to-entities query with 2 joined tables that I would like
How to write (simple) LINQ to Entities query that groups elements by some attribut
I'm having a problem with LINQ to entities which I've resolved, but want to
I will use LINQ-to-SQL when the database is ready and use the entities there
Using LINQ to Entities with Entity Framework and C#: I have a method that
I'm using LINQ to Entities (not LINQ to SQL) and I'm having trouble creating

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.