Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 600881
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T16:39:15+00:00 2026-05-13T16:39:15+00:00

When overloading operators, is it necessary to overload >= <= and !=? It seems

  • 0

When overloading operators, is it necessary to overload >= <= and !=?

It seems like it would be smart for c++ to call !operator= for !=, !> for operator<= and !< for operator>=.

Is that the case, or is it necessary to overload every function?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T16:39:15+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 4:39 pm

    Yes, it is necessary, if you want all of them to work the way you want them to work.

    C++ does not force any specific semantics on most of the overloadable operators. The only thing that is fixed is the general syntax for the operator (including being unary or binary and things like precedence and associativity). This immediately means that the actual functionality that you implement in your overload can be absolutely arbitrary. In general case there might not be any meaningful connection between what operator == does and what operator != does. Operator == might write data to a file, while operator != might sort an array.

    While overloading operators in such an arbitrary fashion is certainly not a good programming practice, the C++ language cannot assume anything. So, no, it cannot and will not automatically use ! == combination in place of !=, or ! > combination in place of <=.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

In the Google C++ Style Guide, there's a section on Operator Overloading that has
I am trying to overload my operators its really just a class that holds
Is there a canonical or recommended pattern for implementing arithmetic operator overloading in C++
In the Boost Signals library, they are overloading the () operator. Is this a
In the Google C++ Style Guide , the section on Operator Overloading recommends against
Is there any way to achieve function overloading in C? I am looking at
What is the best way(s) to fake function overloading in Javascript? I know it
Why don't more mainstream statically typed languages support function/method overloading by return type? I
In VB.NET, which is better to use: function overloading or default parameters?
Hello I have some touble overloading operators for std::list. I store pairs in a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.