Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 903529
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T15:53:45+00:00 2026-05-15T15:53:45+00:00

When running our unit tests in debug mode, at a certain point the Visual

  • 0

When running our unit tests in debug mode, at a certain point the Visual Studio debugger breaks to show the reentrancy MDA. The linked article explains that this occurs when A low-level operating system extensibility point, such as the vectored exception handler calls back into managed application code.

Apparently this can cause heap corruption or other serious problems, so I would definitely like to fix it.

I am looking at the stacktrace at the point where this warning is shown, but I’m having trouble figuring out which “low-level operating system extensibility point” is involved here. I don’t see any unmanaged/managed transitions other than the once caused by mstest and by calling the System.Windows.Forms.Cursors.VSplit getter. Also, simply calling that getter from a unit test doesn’t seem to be sufficient to trigger the warning.

What have I done wrong here, and how do I fix it?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T15:53:46+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 3:53 pm

    As Hans Passant suggested (though unfortunately he has now deleted his answer here), the problem is that in my unit test I’m invoking code which is only designed to be called in the context of a GUI thread with a message loop. There is no such message loop in a unit test.

    In this case the problem is the System.Windows.Forms.Cursors.VSplit getter. I see two ways to avoid this:

    • strictly follow the MVVM pattern and keep the problematic code separate in the view, only test the viewmodel.
    • or hide the cursor managment code behind an interface which is mocked in the unit test
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm considering running unit tests for my Visual Studio 2010 projects on our build
We use Visual Studio 2010 Ultimate with tests written in MSTest. Both our unit
We want to run our unit tests on our TFS server. We are running
I'm trying to convince my organization to start running unit tests on our C++
In our Production environment we have JBoss running in a clustered mode with 4+
Our team is willing to unit-test a new code written under a running project
We are writing unit tests for our ASP.NET application that run against a test
We have some scripts that we run as part of our unit tests. This
I'd like to add logging to our unit tests that records the DLLs they
I want to add memory leak detection to our automated Unit tests. ReportMemoryLeaksOnShutdown will

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.