Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4322382
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 21, 20262026-05-21T08:51:58+00:00 2026-05-21T08:51:58+00:00

When should I mark a class as serializable with the [Serializable] attribute? The documention

  • 0

When should I mark a class as serializable with the [Serializable] attribute? The documention says that the class should not be inherited. However, I have used this attribute in conjuction with the XmlInclude attribute so I can serialize my derived classes as well. Is this incorrect?

I am using the XmlSerializer and StreamWriter classes to serialize my objects.

Also, my understanding tells me that any public properties (get and sets) will be serialized, other fields will be ignored. Is this also correct?

Any guidance would be appreciated.

Thanks

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-21T08:51:59+00:00Added an answer on May 21, 2026 at 8:51 am

    When should I mark a class as
    serializable with the [Serializable]
    attribute? The documention says that
    the class should not be inherited.
    However, I have used this attribute in
    conjuction with the XmlInclude
    attribute so I can serialize my
    derived classes as well. Is this
    incorrect?

    I am using the XmlSerializer and
    StreamWriter classes to serialize my
    objects.

    You never need the [Serializable] attribute for XML serialization. It’s only used for serialization with formatters (e.g. BinaryFormatter, SoapFormatter)

    Also, my understanding tells me that any public properties (get and sets) will be serialized, other fields will be ignored. Is this also correct?

    This is correct. Only public read/write properties are serialized, not fields.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

In NUnit, the TestFixtureSetup attribute can be used to mark a method which should
If I have a dbml file that contains say a Customer class with say
I have a class that fires events delegating to DispatcherObject targets which is marshalling
JBoss 6. I'm led to believe that I can mark a class as @Stateless
I have a view-scoped bean that implements Serializable , and a UIComponent passed in
I am a very inexperienced developer and have run into a problem that should
I've created attribute like [AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Class, AllowMultiple = true)] [Serializable] public class TestPropertyAttribute : System.Attribute
We have a class hierarchy similar to this one: public class TestDereference { private
Should libraries that the application relies on be stored in source control? One part
We have many links with rel attributes: <div class=team-tags> <a class=s1 rel=t1 t2 t3

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.