Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 199239
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T17:00:22+00:00 2026-05-11T17:00:22+00:00

When using a POSIX shell, the following touch {quick,man,strong}ly expands to touch quickly manly

  • 0

When using a POSIX shell, the following

touch {quick,man,strong}ly

expands to

touch quickly manly strongly

Which will touch the files quickly, manly, and strongly, but is it possible to dynamically create the expansion? For example, the following illustrates what I want to do, but does not work because of the order of expansion:

TEST=quick,man,strong    #possibly output from a program
echo {$TEST}ly

Is there any way to achieve this? I do not mind constricting myself to Bash if need be. I would also like to avoid loops. The expansion should be given as complete arguments to any arbitrary program (i.e. the program cannot be called once for each file, it can only be called once for all files). I know about xargs but I’m hoping it can all be done from the shell somehow.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T17:00:22+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 5:00 pm

    … There is so much wrong with using eval. What you’re asking is only possible with eval, BUT what you might want is easily possible without having to resort to bash bug-central.

    Use arrays! Whenever you need to keep multiple items in one datatype, you need (or, should use) an array.

    TEST=(quick man strong)
    touch "${TEST[@]/%/ly}"
    

    That does exactly what you want without the thousand bugs and security issues introduced and concealed in the other suggestions here.

    The way it works is:

    • "${foo[@]}": Expands the array named foo by expanding each of its elements, properly quoted. Don’t forget the quotes!
    • ${foo/a/b}: This is a type of parameter expansion that replaces the first a in foo‘s expansion by a b. In this type of expansion you can use % to signify the end of the expanded value, sort of like $ in regular expressions.
    • Put all that together and “${foo[@]/%/ly}” will expand each element of foo, properly quote it as a separate argument, and replace each element’s end by ly.
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Using POSIX threads & C++, I have an Insert operation which can only be
What are the trade-offs between using a System V and a Posix semaphore?
I am writing a program for POSIX (OSX) where I will have many processes
Using online interfaces to a version control system is a nice way to have
Using PyObjC , you can use Python to write Cocoa applications for OS X.
Using ASP.NET MVC there are situations (such as form submission) that may require a
Using C# .NET 3.5 and WCF, I'm trying to write out some of the
Using TortoiseSVN against VisualSVN I delete a source file that I should not have
Using C# and System.Data.SqlClient, is there a way to retrieve a list of parameters
Using VS2008, C#, .Net 2 and Winforms how can I make a regular Button

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.