Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 916617
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T18:04:49+00:00 2026-05-15T18:04:49+00:00

When using a single threaded loop, I was easily able to limit my messages

  • 0

When using a single threaded loop, I was easily able to limit my messages sent per second by putting the thread to sleep (i.e. Thread.Sleep(1000/MessagesPerSecond)), easy enough… but now that I have expanded into parallel threads this no longer works correctly.

Does anyone have a suggestion how to throttle messages sent when using Parallel threads?

Parallel.For(0, NumberOfMessages, delegate(int i) {

   // Code here

   if (MessagesPerSecond != 0)
      Thread.Sleep(1000/MessagesPerSecond);
});
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T18:04:50+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 6:04 pm

    Use an AutoResetEvent and a timer. Whenever the timer fires, have it Set the AutoResetEvent.

    Then have your process that sends messages WaitOne on the AutoResetEvent immediately before sending.

        private static readonly AutoResetEvent _Next = new AutoResetEvent(true);
        private static Timer _NextTimer;
    
        private static void SendMessages(IEnumerable<Message> messages)
        {
            if (_NextTimer == null)
                InitializeTimer();
    
            Parallel.ForEach(
                messages,
                m =>
                {
                    _Next.WaitOne();
                    // Do something
                }
                );
        }
    
        private static void SetNext(object state)
        {
            _Next.Set();
        }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 499k
  • Answers 500k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer This is not pretty but it works: rm -R $(ls… May 16, 2026 at 12:45 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Yes. Override the base1 and base2 methods in Derived to… May 16, 2026 at 12:45 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer No, you can't. Unfortunately, UIEvent doesn't expose any public way… May 16, 2026 at 12:45 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Related Questions

With lxml.html, how do I access single elements without using a for loop? This
[Cross-posted from lib-curl mailing list] I have a single threaded app (MSVC C++ 2005)
A slow multiple precision implementation of a mandelbrot generator. Threaded, using POSIX threads. Gtk
I'm building a multilingual website. I've been thinking about using a single table for
I am given either a single character or a string, and am using Python.
I am using the task parallel library from .NET framework 4 (specifically Parallel.For and
I want to call a Business layer method from a Windows service (done using
Using Core Data. Let's say we have models for Team and Player. Assume: -Each
I find that my Flex application's UI becomes unresponsive during very long processing loops
I've been reading a couple of docs regarding postgres memory allocation configuration but need

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.