Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
When using easy syntax to initialize derived class fields by directly assigning values to them, compiler emits an IL code which first initializes derived class fields and then call base .ctor. Why it doesnt call base .ctor fields and initialize the derived class fields. What if I would have fields which depend on base class’s fields?
I would love to put some code sample here but I am posting this question from my mobile phone.
I think it is because it needs to handle the case where a virtual method or intializer is called within the constructor.