Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
When using eCobertura and EclEmma resp. I found the code coverage come out as different in each case for the same project.
Interested to know why?
Emma stat
eCobertura stat
One factor may be that EclEmma does not measure coverage correctly for exception handling code – i.e. it may tell you that code is not covered, when in fact it is executed (e.g. if you step through with the debugger, the code is indeed executed). This is a limitation of the underlying JaCoCo library. No idea whether eCobertura has the same issue though.