Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 888879
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T13:28:30+00:00 2026-05-15T13:28:30+00:00

when using objects I sometimes test for their existence e.g if(object) object->Use(); could i

  • 0

when using objects I sometimes test for their existence
e.g

if(object)
 object->Use();

could i just use

(object && object->Use());

and what differences are there, if any?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T13:28:30+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 1:28 pm

    They’re the same assuming object->Use() returns something that’s valid in a boolean context; if it returns void the compiler will complain that a void return isn’t being ignored like it should be, and other return types that don’t fit will give you something like no match for 'operator&&'

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there any performance benefits to using Command objects to validate constraints over using
My object under test has two dependency objects of the same type. Sometimes when
I'm using VB 2010 Express and sometimes my code is just ignored, without any
I'm using Jackson to serialize and deserialize objects. The problem is that sometimes I
Just wanted to know if anyone is really using Objects and Collections in Oracle
Quite frequently, I'm using custom Wicket components to render model objects. Objects can sometimes
I am using a dedicated test SL web application that hosts SL object I
We are using builder pattern to generate test data. These domain objects have relations
Sometimes, it is useful to create DOM elements as jQuery objects for use as
I have two test cases using a reasonably large json object (1.2mb): source: data

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.