Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
When using PInvoke, I noticed that we need to use IntPtr to refer to Windows handles. I am wondering why not just use int for the handle? My understanding of a handle is that it is just an integer value.
A windows handle is defined as an integer of the native machine pointer size. That’s so that they can secretly be a pointer if they need to be. (A handle probably is not a pointer, but it is permitted to be one if the operating system implementers deem it necessary. They typically are not actually pointers for security reasons; it makes it too easy for people to abuse the system if they are actually pointers.)
An int in C# defined as a 32 bit integer, which will be too small on a 64 bit machine. An IntPtr is defined as an integer that can hold a pointer of the machine size. That’s why you always use IntPtr when interoperating with handles.