Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 199011
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T16:59:12+00:00 2026-05-11T16:59:12+00:00

When using setTimeout , you have to put the code you want to execute

  • 0

When using setTimeout, you have to put the code you want to execute into a string:

setTimeout('alert("foobar!");', 1000);

However, I want to execute a function to which I have a reference in a variable. I want to be able to do this:

var myGreatFunction = function() { alert("foobar!"); };
// ...
setTimeout('myGreatFunction();', 1000);

(Though in real life, the alert is a lengthier bit of code and myGreatFunction gets passed around as a parameter to other functions, within which the setTimeout is called.)

Of course, when the timeout triggers, myGreatFunction isn’t a recognised function so it doesn’t execute.

I wish javascript let me do this, but it doesn’t:

setTimeout(function() { myGreatFunction(); }, 1000);

Is there a nice way round this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T16:59:12+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 4:59 pm

    If you don’t need to call myGreatFunction with any arguments, you should be able to pass setTimeout a function reference:

    setTimeout(myGreatFunction, 1000);
    

    Also, you should always avoid passing setTimeout code that it needs to evaluate (which is what happens when you wrap the code in quotes). Instead, wrap the code in an anonymous function:

    setTimeout(function() {
        // Code here...
    }, 1000);
    

    See the setTimeout page at the Mozilla Development Centre for more information.

    Steve

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 101k
  • Answers 101k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The Unit Of Work you are describing is already provided… May 11, 2026 at 8:03 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer (made wiki, in case of dups) C# (3.0) doesn't support… May 11, 2026 at 8:03 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer There isn't a built in constant in the current .NET… May 11, 2026 at 8:03 pm

Related Questions

My users keep complaining that a link does not show up for them. For
I'm trying to implement a comet style, long polling connection using an XMLHttpResponse object.
I have read the post here about using setTimeout() during intensive DOM processing (using
Something that has always bugged me is how unpredictable the setTimeout() method in Javascript
I have created an interface using jQuery UI Tabs, however one of my requirements

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.