Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8819929
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 14, 20262026-06-14T05:29:04+00:00 2026-06-14T05:29:04+00:00

When using WIF, the client is able to set the persistentCookiesOnPassiveRedirects which by default

  • 0

When using WIF, the client is able to set the persistentCookiesOnPassiveRedirects which by default is false. Here is the provided definition:

persistentCookiesOnPassiveRedirects: Specifies whether persistent
cookies are issued when the module is enabled to initiate
WS-Federation passive protocol redirects. A persistent cookie will
outlast user sessions.

OK that sounds clear, but I still do not get it and changing the value between true/fasle does not seem to make any difference. Does it have anything to do about pulling up another site in a separate browser that trusts the same STS provider and making it so the user does not have to log in again?

I suppose an example of a site and STS working together would be really helpful to explain exactly what this setting does. Thanks!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-14T05:29:05+00:00Added an answer on June 14, 2026 at 5:29 am

    It means that the FedAuth cookies issued by WIF will be persistent (as opposed to tied to a user session). If you close the browser and open it again, the cookies will still be sent to your site and token negotiation will not happen (you will not be redirected to the STS).

    If it is false, each time you close the browser and open it again the negotiation will be triggered, because there’s no token anymore. (Cookies is where WIF stores the information of the security token).

    Notice that the STS itself will also issue cookies (different from your app) and those might be persistent, so the actual authentication might not happen the second time even if you set the flag to false.

    Notice also that WIF can optionally store the information it needs somewhere else (server side).

    Last but not least, the token might expire, in that case the negotiation will be triggered regardless of the flag.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am using WIF and claims-based security in a MVC app and custom logic
I'm currently looking into using WIF for an upcoming project and would appreciate some
I'm using Windows Identity Foundation (WIF) for authentication in my ASP.NET MVC 3 project.
We have implemented SSO in a .NET web application using Windows Identity Foundation (WIF).
I am researching the possibilities of using WIF to identify users on parts of
In my MVC application I'm using WIF. I've added STS reference using Visual Studio
I'm struggling with securing IIS hosted svc WCF service hosted in Azure using WIF
Because I'm awesome I'm trying to run the latest WIF demo app using VS2k10
We are using Azure ACS together with WIF on a Win2003 R2 server, running
We are developing an MVC app using STS. We used the WIF tools to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.