Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 617077
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T18:23:44+00:00 2026-05-13T18:23:44+00:00

when you allocate dynamic memory on the heap using a pointer, char *buffer_heap =

  • 0

when you allocate dynamic memory on the heap using a pointer,

char *buffer_heap = new char[15];

it would be represented in memory as:

 ÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍÍýýýý««««««««þþþ

why doesn’t there be a NULL terminating character at the end instead of ýýýý««««««««þþþ?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T18:23:44+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 6:23 pm

    Í is byte 0xCD, which the Windows debug allocator writes into your 15 bytes of memory to indicate that it is uninitialised heap memory. Uninitialized stack would be 0xCC. The idea is that if you ever read memory and unexpectedly get this value, you can think to yourself, “hmm, I’ve probably forgotten to initialise this”. Also, if you read it as a pointer and dereference it, then Windows will crash your process, whereas if an uninitialised buffer were filled with random or arbitrary values then sometimes by fluke you’d get a valid pointer, and your code might cause all kinds of trouble. C++ doesn’t say what values uninitialized memory holds, and non-debug allocators won’t waste time filling memory with special values for every allocation, so you must never rely on that value being there.

    This is followed by 4 bytes of ý (byte 0xFD), which the Windows debug allocator uses to indicate an out-of-bounds region at the end of a buffer. The idea is that if you ever find yourself in the debugger writing to a region that looks like this, you can think “hmm, I’ve probably overrun my buffer here”. Also, if the value has changed when the buffer is freed, the memory allocator can warn you that your code is wrong.

    « is byte 0xAB, and þ is 0xFE. Presumably these are also intended as eye-catchers (they aren’t plausible pointers or offsets, so they don’t form part of the heap structure). I don’t know what they signify, possibly more guard data like the 0xFD.

    Finally, I guess, you’ve found a 0 byte, the 16th byte beyond the end of your 15 byte buffer (i.e. the 31st byte counting from the start of it).

    Asking the question as “C++” without mentioning that you’re on Windows suggests that this is how C++ behaves. It isn’t, it’s how one implementation of C++ behaves, with particular compiler options and/or linked dlls. C++ does not permit you to read past the end of the buffer, Microsoft is just being nice to you and letting you get away with it not crashing or worse.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 435k
  • Answers 435k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer hashlib is new in 2.5. You'll need the backport for… May 15, 2026 at 3:27 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Macros do only simple text manipulation, i.e. they are very… May 15, 2026 at 3:27 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The documentation has the examples you need. May 15, 2026 at 3:27 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.