Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3224022
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T16:10:29+00:00 2026-05-17T16:10:29+00:00

When you query existing linq results, it’s like they’re stuck a layer deeper than

  • 0

When you query existing linq results, it’s like they’re stuck a layer deeper than the original result. Let me explain what I mean by this.

In the example below, after getting ResultSorted, to get to the data therein, you have to use RowSorted.All.TableData.Field, but in the unsorted Result, you could just do Row.TableData.Field. In the sorted data, you have to use .All to get to the rest of the data, which is like an extra layer to get to the data you’re looking for.

How can I get it so I can query Result without getting this extra layer? Thanks Stack-O!

var Result =
from a in Db.Table
select new {TableData = a};

var ResultSorted = 
from a in Result
orderby a.TableData.Field
select new {All = a};

foreach(var RowSorted in ResultSorted)
{
    MessageBox.Show(RowSorted.All.TableData.ToString());
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T16:10:29+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 4:10 pm

    You can use

    var Result =
    from a in Db.Table
    select a;
    
    var ResultSorted = 
    from a in Result
    orderby a.Field
    select a;
    
    foreach(var RowSorted in ResultSorted)
    {
        MessageBox.Show(RowSorted.ToString());
    }
    

    Edit:
    The thing is that

    select new {TableData = a};
    

    creates a new anonymous type with a field called TableData, like this

    class Tmp1
    {
         TableType TableData {get; set;}
    }
    

    and

    select new {All = a};
    

    creates a new anonymous type with a field called TableData, like this

    class Tmp2
    {
         Tmp1 All {get; set;}
    }
    

    Edit 2:
    If you select a directly you don’t create the extra anonymous type, instead you return the TableType.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I would like to evaluate JPA on an existing project. The database model and
I'm learning Linq-to-Sql, and I'm encountering the scenario where I'm trying to build a
I have the following CAML Query. What I need in it is another clause
My django model looks like this: class Entity(models.Model): name = models.CharField(max_length=40) examples = models.ManyToManyField(Example,
I have this table: id | owner | asset | rate ------------------------- 1 |
How can you do a conditional where clause? I have a rake task that
I have table name called Person with following column names P_Id(int), LastName(varchar), FirstName (varchar).
I am trying to read in an XML file and compare it to fields
The get_tag_id is bringing back the first array item twice if I enter the
I'm trying to manipulate a PHP script so that it redirects to a particular

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.