Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 151213
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T09:24:50+00:00 2026-05-11T09:24:50+00:00

Where I work, we have a large codebase of C code that we build

  • 0

Where I work, we have a large codebase of C code that we build using Visual Studio 2005. It’s separated into a variety of projects, including several static libraries. There are two solutions we primarily use, Full Debug (which turns off optimizations entirely), and Debug (we selectively optimize around 20% of files, while leaving the rest unoptimized for ease of debugging). Right now we enable the selective optimization of files by setting those properties on each file individually.

This system SORT of works, but is a giant pain because of the very large size of our project. I was looking into adding manual precompiled headers into our code base, but ran into the problem that the optimization setting of the precompiled header must match that of the C file. So, for our Debug build I need to make two precompiled headers, one optimized and one not. I would then set the project to use the nonoptimized one, and go through to each optimized file and manually change which precompiled header to use. I don’t really want to do this.

What are some possible solutions for this? If there was some way to apply property sheets to individual files (as opposed to an entire configuration) that would make things a lot easier. Also, if I could somehow craft a macro statement for the precompiled header location ($(confname)/$(valueofparameteroptimized).pch or something) that would also solve it. Or, if those aren’t possible, what solutions do people create adhoc for dealing with setting properties on subsets of files? Upgrading to 2008 is an option, if there’s some solution there that would fix it (we were thinking about upgrading anyway).

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T09:24:51+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 9:24 am

    You can avoid changing file settings by enabling and disabling optimisations using #pragma optimize in code:

    eg.cpp:

    // top of the file, after headers #if defined(DEBUG) && defined(PARTIAL_OPTIMISATION) #pragma optimize( 'g', on ) #endif  void MyFunc() {...} 
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 165k
  • Answers 165k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer There are a couple of variants of a rename command,… May 12, 2026 at 12:33 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer There is currently no way to build CLS-compliant assemblies from… May 12, 2026 at 12:33 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You might want to look at Google Protocol Buffers or… May 12, 2026 at 12:33 pm

Related Questions

At work we have a very large code-base that we commonly export for a
As part of upgrading JRun, we are moving from a 1.4 JVM to a
My studio has a large codebase that has been developed over 10+ years. The
In fairly large Ruby application, we have a situation where a given object is

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.