Which is more robust? Coz I read Linus Torvalds ‘s article about how bad is boost. Is that tr1 is better than boost?
Share
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Which is more robust? Coz I read Linus Torvalds ‘s article about how bad is boost. Is that tr1 is better than boost?
TR1 is a set of libraries that were proposed additions to the C++ Standard Library. Most of them originated in Boost and most of them are now included in the latest C++0x draft standard.
There are some differences between different versions of the Boost implementations of the libraries, the TR1 specification of the libraries, and the latest C++0x specification, but the fundamentals are largely the same.
Linus Torvalds vocally hates C++ as a whole and his ranting about C++ should not be taken seriously. The Boost libraries are extraordinarily useful.