Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 47887
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T16:11:36+00:00 2026-05-10T16:11:36+00:00

Which is your favorite way to go with strings in C++? A C-style array

  • 0

Which is your favorite way to go with strings in C++? A C-style array of chars? Or wchar_t? CString, std::basic_string, std::string, BSTR or CComBSTR?

Certainly each of these has its own area of application, but anyway, which is your favorite and why?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T16:11:36+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 4:11 pm

    std::string or std::wstring, depending on your needs. Why?

    • They’re standard
    • They’re portable
    • They can handle I18N
    • They have performance guarantees (as per the standard)
    • Protected against buffer overflows and similar attacks
    • Are easily converted to other types as needed
    • Are nicely templated, giving you a wide variety of options while reducing code bloat and improving performance. Really. Compilers that can’t handle templates are long gone now.

    A C-style array of chars is just asking for trouble. You’ll still need to deal with them on occasion (and that’s what std::string.c_str() is for), but, honestly — one of the biggest dangers in C is programmers doing Bad Things with char* and winding up with buffer overflows. Just don’t do it.

    An array of wchar__t is the same thing, just bigger.

    CString, BSTR, and CComBSTR are not standard and not portable. Avoid them unless absolutely forced. Optimally, just convert a std::string/std::wstring to them when needed, which shouldn’t be very expensive.

    Note that std::string is just a child of std::basic_string, but you’re still better off using std::string unless you have a really good reason not to. Really Good. Let the compiler take care of the optimization in this situation.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 280k
  • Answers 280k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You need to allow ActiveRecord to do its own initialization… May 13, 2026 at 3:42 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Looks like a Zebra label printer, I've had the displeasure.… May 13, 2026 at 3:42 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I would delegate this logic to the individual IRecipie classes:… May 13, 2026 at 3:42 pm

Related Questions

It happens more often than not that I have to comment several lines at
I must implement a web service which expose a list of values (integers, custom
This question is motivated by something I've lately started to see a bit too
I'm going to be working on an application that allows our client to define

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.