Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6014455
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T02:41:41+00:00 2026-05-23T02:41:41+00:00

which of the following is more efficient? Using a get function on a token

  • 0

which of the following is more efficient?

  1. Using a get function on a token (random), for example:

    http://www.example.com/category/subcategory/subsubcategory?value=random
    $_GET['value']

  2. Make the token part of the URL and parse it, for example:

    $url="http://www.example.com/category/subcategory/subsubcategory/random"
    basename($url)

And actually, is basename more efficient than using explode or substr(strrchr())?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T02:41:42+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 2:41 am

    $_GET is obviously more efficient, since it doesn’t compute anything

    Still, unless you plan on calling that a few thousand times in your script, it’s negligible so use whatever you feel works better.

    $t = microtime(true);
    for($i = 0; $i<1000; $i++) {
        $x = basename($url);
    }
    printf("%.3f\n", microtime(true) - $t);
    

    0.010

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm currently using the following function which is based on an example from the
Currently i'm using the following, which seems quite slow for multiple clips: static function
I am wondering which is more efficient, using CStr() or object.toString() . The reason
I'm curious which of the following below would be more efficient? I've always been
Myself and a colleague have a dispute about which of the following is more
I've the following code in PHP which works fine (returns more or less 10
I have the following code in a c++ listener class (more or less), which
Consider a typical social networking website, which has more or less the following models:
I have the following scenario which I've been using to return a single row
I have the following which works in SQL Query Analyzer . select oh.* from

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.