Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 999413
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T07:20:53+00:00 2026-05-16T07:20:53+00:00

Which one is better for (mysql) performance ? 1500 (300×5) Tables with 365 rows

  • 0

Which one is better for (mysql) performance ?

“1500 (300×5) Tables with 365 rows per table” OR “(300×5)1500×365 rows in 1 table” ?

(I will get the data(s) with php.)

365 -> days number of the year

  • if second: I will use “date” and “x_id” to get the 1 row from (300×5)1500×365 rows.
  • if first: I will use “date” and “table_name” to get 1 row from 365 rows.**
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T07:20:54+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 7:20 am

    Second one.
    http://datacharmer.blogspot.com/2009/03/normalization-and-smoking.html

    [edited after updates to question]

    In second case you can create an index on columns (x_id,date) which will improve performance of WHERE x_id = ? AND date = ? searches. Some ~550000 rows is not much for well indexed table.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Which one is better when performance is taken into consideration an if else if
just want to ask for an opinion regarding mysql. which one is the better
Which one performs better to run a game main loop?
Grails vs Rails. Which has better support? And which one is a better choice
Out of the following queries, which method would you consider the better one? What
Which one is better, Tinyint with 0 and 1 values or ENUM 0,1 in
which one of the following is considered better a design and why ?. i
I'm currently debugging a huge MySql call which joins a large amount of tables
I have a mysql statement which grabs just one record based on an id.
Which one should I use? catch (_com_error e) or catch (_com_error& e)

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.