Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9225163
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 18, 20262026-06-18T04:30:37+00:00 2026-06-18T04:30:37+00:00

While analyzing Netflow V9, I am able to get most of the fields ids

  • 0

While analyzing Netflow V9, I am able to get most of the fields ids correctly along with their values as that is defined in

http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xml

but I am getting 40000 ,40001, 40002, … instead of 224, 225, 226, … for NAT fileds,
however the values for each fields I retrieved are correct.

I am certain that all fields’ id and value are correctly obtained.
I don’t know what is the real problem. I tried with conversion of host to network byte and vice versa using

field_type = socket.ntohs(struct.unpack('H', template_data[a:b])[0])

P.S. I used cisco router for netflow v9.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-18T04:30:38+00:00Added an answer on June 18, 2026 at 4:30 am

    Cisco doesn’t use IPFIX, but NetFlow v9. Although IPFIX is derived from Cisco’s NetFlow v9 specification, there are some differences. One of them is that IPFIX allows for per-vendor namespaces in the field type numbers using the PrivateEnterpriseNumber. NetFlow v9 does not have such a facility, therefore vendors have to arbitrarily choose a range of numbers to report their custom fields on and hope no one else picks the same range. In this case, I’m guessing your getting your NetFlow tickets from Cisco ASA, which indeed uses a number of fields in the range of 40000-40005.

    There is a document called ‘Cisco ASA 5500 Series Implementation Note for NetFlow Collectors, 8.3‘ which describes those fields.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

While analyzing our crash logs I discovered that a fairly common crash is one
With a customer web site we currently experiences performance problems. While analyzing the problem
While analyzing some library code supplied by another company we have come across strange
I've written a custom task for analyzing code coverage results. While building the entire
While analyzing some approaches to making our web app easier to deploy on our
I'm analyzing a small LWP useragent in a loop with an HTTP analyzer and
As guide I use this article http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb668969.aspx After step 3 (Analyzing sourcesafe folder) I
While testing and analyzing code of Bluetooth Chat, I have questions about my own
I am using sharekit in my application where while building and analyzing the application
I am about to design my own minesweeper in Java. And while analyzing the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.