Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9195787
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 17, 20262026-06-17T21:42:20+00:00 2026-06-17T21:42:20+00:00

While designing a class or a function, which way, that is shown below, is

  • 0

While designing a class or a function, which way, that is shown below, is better and why?

class Container {

    //Provide this functionality??
    void addItemVariadic(const Value& val, ...);

    //Or provide this functionality??
    void addItemList(const list<Value>& vals);

};

Is it better to provide a function like addItemVariadic(..), or addItemList(..)?

Or is it better to provide a set of such functions, like further taking some iterators, or is it better to limit the functionality, like just taking a list?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-17T21:42:21+00:00Added an answer on June 17, 2026 at 9:42 pm

    Using variadic functions is dangerous

    If you ever pass a variable which has not the appriopriate type, it will crash at run time, when calling the function.

    On the contrary if you use a std::list, it won’t compile simply, and you avoid a crash.

    Btw: I advice you to use std::vector instead of std::list in this case.

    Edit1 Possible Dupplicate Question. with a nice solution using operator << to inputs all the parameters in one shot.

    Edit2 So as to choose between different std::containers, there is a choose-graph as answer to this question. This graph addresses at C++03, it doesn’t cover the new containers introduced in C++1.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have been trying different techniques while designing this application, which to me is
I'm designing classes for my application (network tool). I this base class: class Descriptor
While designing a C++ class, suppose I have following two options: Option 1: One
While designing a class ( in c#, or any oop lang) i always get
While designing an interface for a class I normally get caught in two minds
This question came up while designing a dedicated ACL system for a custom application,
While designing a service class should it be singleton in java? Generally DAO is
While designing/changing the page layout, I have a coloring for each of div/class elements
While designing the class, I always get confused what to put in Constructor and
Possible Duplicate: Start thread with member function While defining a thread constructor with class

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.