Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
While designing a table my colleague here says that I should avoid identity column as it is specific to SQL Server and MS Access, But I differ with his views as it makes my coding simpler.
Should I use identity column or not? If not what is best way to create the identity columns from application code?
You can’t completely divorce an application from the database vendor. If you do you won’t be able to take advantages of whatever features your database provides you.
I’d say use the identity column. If you move over to Oracle (for example), you can use a Sequence. Hardly a big change.
I don’t know what technology you’re using, but one thing that would help is using a tool such as Hibernate or iBATIS (I think they’re both available for Java and .NET) which separates you a bit from the database implementation details. Then if you change database vendor you won’t need to change application code, just configuration. (In theory, at least!)