Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 393969
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T16:18:36+00:00 2026-05-12T16:18:36+00:00

While implementing an == operator, I have the feeling that I am missing some

  • 0

While implementing an == operator, I have the feeling that I am missing some essential points.
Hence, I am searching some best practices around that.
Here are some related questions I am thinking about:

  • How to cleanly handle the reference comparison?
  • Should it be implemented through a IEquatable<T>-like interface? Or overriding object.Equals?
  • And what about the != operator?

(this list might not be exhaustive).

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T16:18:37+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 4:18 pm

    I would follow Microsoft’s Guidelines for Overloading Equals() and Operator ==.

    edit: Microsoft’s guidelines contain this important remark, which seems to confirm Henk’s answer:

    By default, the operator == tests for reference equality by
    determining if two references indicate the same object, so reference
    types do not need to implement operator == in order to gain this
    functionality. When a type is immutable, meaning the data contained in
    the instance cannot be changed, overloading operator == to compare
    value equality instead of reference equality can be useful because, as
    immutable objects, they can be considered the same as long as they
    have the same value. Overriding operator == in non-immutable types is
    not recommended

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 216k
  • Answers 216k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Sorry, but your looks like statements are false: the callback… May 12, 2026 at 11:12 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I found the problem, i was reenabling the button on… May 12, 2026 at 11:12 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Constructor for class optparse.OptionParser(...) has optional named parameter 'add_help_option', which… May 12, 2026 at 11:12 pm

Related Questions

I came across this recently, up until now I have been happily overriding the
I'm implementing unit tests for a family of functions that all share a number
I'm implementing a Knuth shuffle for a C++ project I'm working on. I'm trying
I have a problem. I've been trying to tackle it for a while now

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.