Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7836247
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 2, 20262026-06-02T14:03:09+00:00 2026-06-02T14:03:09+00:00

While looking at Linux kernel’s implementation of doubly linked circular lists, I’ve found following

  • 0

While looking at Linux kernel’s implementation of doubly linked circular lists, I’ve found following macro:

#define container_of(ptr, type, member) ({           \
const typeof( ((type *)0)->member ) *__mptr = (ptr); \
(type *)( (char *)__mptr - offsetof(type,member) );})

The way this works is that it returns pointer to structure given only address of one of its members:

struct blabla
{
    int value;
    struct list_head *list;
}

Thus you can get pointer to blabla (and get to “value”) given only pointer to list.
To my question, how would I make this as portable as possible (best case conforming to C89/C99?). Due to usage of typeof(), this is gcc only.

This is what I’ve got so far:

#define container_of(ptr, type, member) (                  \
                (type *) (char *)(ptr)-offsetof(type,member)\
                )

Is this snippet conforming to ISO standards (and thus should be able to be compiled on any conforming compiler)?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-02T14:03:11+00:00Added an answer on June 2, 2026 at 2:03 pm

    As Ouah commented, the ({ ... }) statement expression is a GNU extension; you won’t be able to use that. Your core expression is close to what’s required, but doesn’t have enough parentheses:

    #define container_of(ptr, type, member) \
                          ((type *) ((char *)(ptr) - offsetof(type, member)))
    

    That looks clean to me. It’s only spread across two lines for SO.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

A while back a found a great-looking framework that allowed .net developers to implement
While looking up the answer to this question: Why is an out parameter not
While looking for a way to temporarily save the search results when a user
While looking for ways to find the size of a file given a FILE*
While looking at some conceptual questions in C,I came across this question in a
I've just saw an unfamiliar syntax while looking for GroupBy return type: public interface
I'm trying to learn Rails better by looking at example applications, and while looking
My problem is very simple, yet I feel lost while looking at it ...
After looking a while other google, and the web, I decided to post my
Possible Duplicate: Class construction with initial values While I was looking at c++ example

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.