Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4172766
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 21, 20262026-05-21T00:36:09+00:00 2026-05-21T00:36:09+00:00

While looking at messages in Wireshark, I have noted that Checksum validation is always

  • 0

While looking at messages in Wireshark, I have noted that Checksum validation is always disabled. Is it like an obsolete requirement, or does it apply to internet traffic only which goes outside the firewall of a company network?

Also, can someone please advice how it is set (eg., whether from an application or network card setting, etc.)

PS: The question might not be of practical significance. I am asking this to fill the large missing gaps in my poor network programming skills. I had heard that checksum validation is a major bottleneck for tcp communication, but am surprised that it is disabled for all messages that I have seen

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-21T00:36:10+00:00Added an answer on May 21, 2026 at 12:36 am

    This question is answered in the Wireshark FAQ.

    The upshot is that checksums are generally calculated by network cards, and Wireshark often intercepts packets before they hit the hardware that does the actual calculation. Enabling validation for those packets results in a large number of errors, so they disabled validation by default. More info is available via the link.

    Edit: just to address fruit’s comment below, I screenshotted a couple of TCP packets for comparison. The first one is a TCP packet without validation:

    Validation disabled

    You can see that there is a non-zero checksum there, so it might appear that Wireshark (or some other pre-hardware app) has done the checksum for you. However, when we turn validation on for this same packet..

    enter image description here

    Now we can see that this checksum wasn’t valid in the first place. I can’t find a source for this info, but I think it’s strong evidence that Wireshark is not populating that field for us; doing so would go against Wireshark’s nature anyway. Instead, I expect that this is just an uninitialized field in the packet – it takes more work to set a field to zero than to omit setting it at all.

    It’s also worth noting that as time goes on, more and more network stacks will be offloading checksumming to the hardware, so there will be fewer and fewer cases of valid checksums coming from the local machine.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

A while back a found a great-looking framework that allowed .net developers to implement
While looking for something totally different the other day, I have stumbled upon two
we're have a client that needs to get interactive messages from a server, from
To preface we have a strange requirement that all dialogs must be modeless for
While looking up the answer to this question: Why is an out parameter not
While looking for a way to temporarily save the search results when a user
While looking for ways to find the size of a file given a FILE*
While looking at some conceptual questions in C,I came across this question in a
I've just saw an unfamiliar syntax while looking for GroupBy return type: public interface
I'm trying to learn Rails better by looking at example applications, and while looking

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.