Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6903341
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T07:54:48+00:00 2026-05-27T07:54:48+00:00

While looking at the Timer documentation I ran across the following example with this

  • 0

While looking at the Timer documentation I ran across the following example with this comment:

    // Normally, the timer is declared at the class level,
    // so that it stays in scope as long as it is needed.
    // If the timer is declared in a long-running method,  
    // KeepAlive must be used to prevent the JIT compiler 
    // from allowing aggressive garbage collection to occur 
    // before the method ends. You can experiment with this
    // by commenting out the class-level declaration and 
    // uncommenting the declaration below; then uncomment
    // the GC.KeepAlive(aTimer) at the end of the method.
    //System.Timers.Timer aTimer;
    code in between
    // If the timer is declared in a long-running method, use
    // KeepAlive to prevent garbage collection from occurring
    // before the method ends.
    //GC.KeepAlive(aTimer);

Does this mean that the GC in C# is allowed to garbage collect local variables even if it would have side effects? Presumably because I’m not accessing the timer afterwards again the GC can collect it earlier?

Not sure I’m a fan of such an optimization if I understand this correctly (but then I probably don’t 😉 )

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T07:54:49+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 7:54 am

    Yes, GC might collect local variable before ending of the scope, as soon as after last use of the variable. Putting GC.KeepAlive at the end of the method ensures that the variable will be ‘alive’ until the KeepAlive call.

    C# is imperative language so the GC hasn’t been designed to know anything about side effects.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

While looking at a micro-optimization question that I asked yesterday ( here ), I
While looking at online code samples, I have sometimes come across an assignment of
While looking up the answer to this question: Why is an out parameter not
I'm trying to learn Rails better by looking at example applications, and while looking
Am I correct to assume that this logic (explained in the comment), is incorrect?
We have an SP timer job that was running fine for quite a while.
I have some code that will be accessed from two threads: class Timer{ public:
While looking for a light-weight Scala development environment, I came upon an Scala edit
While looking for an SFTP client in C# SSH File Transfer Protocol (SFTP), I've
While looking for a way to temporarily save the search results when a user

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.